V
- HYPER-CALVINISM
Therefore we need to ask, what is a
"Hyper-Calvinist"?
The word "Hyper" indicates
a "going beyond", "further than
the proper bounds"; it indicates an extreme,
beyond the norm; and indeed there is such a thing
as Hyper-Calvinism, but this can hardly be an
acceptance and preaching of the "5
points", for looking historically and
accurately at Calvinism the "5 points"
are the norm.
In a very real sense Arminianism and
Hyper-Calvinism share a basic factor in common.
They both try to apply human logic to the divine
revelation. The Arminian reasons this way -
"because men are commanded to repent and
believe the gospel, they must therefore have the
ability within themselves to do so" (they
fail to apply the same logic to God's command to
men to keep His law). From this bad logic they
derive their doctrine of free will. The
Hyper-Calvinist reasons this way - "because
men do not have the ability within themselves to
repent and believe the gospel, therefore there is
no point in commanding them to do so". Both
these groups are correct until they get to their
"therefore", and then human logic and
deduction takes over; but unfortunately they go
beyond what is revealed in the Scriptures.
The Calvinistic, Biblical position
takes the truth from both these statements and
holds them both without trying to make them
"logical". Men are commanded to repent
and believe the gospel, and they are responsible
to God to do so; men are unable in and of
themselves to repent and believe because of their
sinful nature. This is the dilemma into which the
grace of God enters, according to His purpose of
election, and by the mighty power of the Spirit,
those for whom Christ died are made alive, and
brought by the gospel to repentance and faith in
the Saviour. This is the miracle of God's
salvation!
The Hyper-Calvinist grasps the truth
of man's inability, and the truth that God will
certainly save His elect, but he wrongly deducts
from that there is no necessity therefore to
preach the gospel to every creature, and to
engage in efforts to reach the lost.
His "logic" in going
beyond the Scriptures brings him into an
unbiblical position where he ceases to see the
necessity of using God-ordained "means"
to produce the God-ordained goals. This sad fact
often produces a lack of evangelistic zeal and
missionary activity among Hyper-Calvinists, and a
lack of compassion for the lost.
Coupled with this fact we may say
that the Hyper-Calvinist not only does not see
the necessity for preaching the gospel to every
creature, but considers it wrong to urge
repentance and faith upon sinners
indiscriminately. It is sometimes expressed this
way, that the Hyper-Calvinist does not believe in
"duty faith" and "duty
repentance"; he does not believe that all
men should be invited to come to Christ. In
contrast to this, the historic Calvinist does
most certainly believe that it is the duty and
responsibility of all men to repent and believe
even though they have, through sin, lost the
ability to do so; and the Calvinist does not
hesitate to bid all men everywhere to repent, and
to invite every man to trust the Saviour.
True Calvinism therefore is not
opposed to evangelism and missionary activity for
it recognizes that the elect must be saved
through the gospel, and like Paul the Calvinist
puts the question "how shall they hear
without a preacher"? Again, if it is the
duty of all men to repent and believe, then all
men must be told of this responsibility. The fact
that true Calvinism is not opposed to evangelism
and missionary work is attested to by the great
names of history who have gone to the ends of the
earth to proclaim the gospel and who were
Calvinistic in their theology. The names of John
Eliot, David Brainerd, John Paton, William Carey
and George Whitefield suffice to make the point.
Hyper-Calvinism is also
characterised by the view that God's decree of
election is viewed without reference to the Fall
of man, that is, the Hyper-Calvinist believes
that God created some men with the express
purpose of damning them simply as creatures, not
as sinful, fallen creatures.
Historic Calvinism, on the other
hand, has always presented God's decree of
election as a most gracious decree against the
background of the Fall of man. Out of a race
already on the way to hell because of its own
sin. God graciously wills to choose a great
multitude out of sheer mercy and grace. God does
not damn men for nothing says Calvinism. He damns
them because of their sin.
Another characteristic that has been
seen in some (though not all) Hyper-Calvinists is
"Antinomianism". The word means
"against or opposed to the law". It
represents the idea that the moral law is not
binding on the Christian, and some have indeed
claimed to be God's elect, and on the basis of
his claim have then proceeded to live as they
pleased, disregarding the Word of God and
bringing great reproach on the cause of Truth.
Historic Calvinism, following the
Bible as its guide, has also insisted that the
fact of election is always revealed in holiness
of life, and has strongly condemned the
Antinomianism of some Hyper-Calvinists.
Other factors might be added, but
enough has been said to show that Hyper-Calvinism
is as distinct from Historic Calvinism as is
Arminianism. They are both extreme positions,
though of course opposite extremes; they are both
departures from the Biblical position, and both
suffer from the insistence of applying human
logic where human logic has no right to be!
|